home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- THE TRINITY ANSWER
-
- I am suspicious of the Trinity doctrine but I accept it
- because no other explanation fits the evidence. The Mormon idea
- does not fit the evidence. They say the Godhead consists of three
- distinct Gods who are united in purpose. This does not fit verses
- which say there is only one God Being (cf.Is 43:10,11). The United
- Pentecostal idea does not fit the evidence. They say Jesus is
- merely the Father in a different form. But, we know Jesus was WITH
- the Father from the beginning (John 1:1, Phil 2:6,7; John 17:5)!
- So, it is not enough to say Jesus was God, you must also say he
- was WITH God, making him a distinct person, other than the Father.
- In addition, Jesus prays to his Father (John 17:5) which also
- proves Jesus is a different person than the Father. The Jehovah's
- Witness idea does not fit the evidence. They make Jesus to be a
- created being when scripture identifies him as from everlasting
- (Micah 5:2) to everlasting (Heb 7:3). But, just what is the
- evidence? Basically there are five categories of evidence.
-
- The Five Evidences only one Being is truly God, and His name is
- Jehovah. The Father is identified as Jehovah or God. Jesus is
- identified as Jehovah or God. The Holy Spirit is identified as
- Jehovah or God. All three are identified as separate persons from
- one another.
-
- Let us presume for a moment all five are true. If we do, then
- the answer we come up with must not deny any of the five evidences.
- If you say there are three separate Beings like the Mormons do, you
- contradict the first point. If you say there is only one person
- like the United Pentecostals do, you contradict the last point.
- If you say Jesus is only a created being like the Jehovah's
- Witnesses do, you contradict the center point. The only answer
- which can fit all five pieces of evidence is the Trinity.
-
- But, what is the definition of the Trinity? That God is a
- singular Spirit Being who is hypostatically three persons. What
- is meant by hypostatic? First, realize we are dealing with a Being
- of Spirit. It may help to compare a Spirit Being to a Being of
- Light or a Being of Fire. Imagine a single flame which divides
- itself into three flames and then the three move together as one
- again, but the three remain distinctly different from each other
- while burning together as one flame. Hear them speaking to each
- other within the flame. Yet, when they speak to us they speak in
- the singular, I AM. Or picture a Ball of Light which separates
- itself into three balls of Light and then comes together again as
- one glowing orb. Yet, the three remain distinct from each other
- within the one. That is Hypostatic Union.
-
- A hypostatic union is where there is absolute unity of essence
- without loss of individual identity. But, Light and Fire can not
- pass through walls whereas Spirit can. So Spirit lends itself
- fully to hypostatic union as compared to Light or Fire. Someone
- might say to me the flame was not three (3) until it divided
- itself, therefore there was a time when the other two did not
- exist. That is due to the weakness of my illustration. I ask you
- to imagine it was always three in one. Besides, if I reach down
- in the fireplace and pull out a log and there is fire on that log,
- which is older? Is the fire in the fire place older or the fire
- on the log? They are both the same age. They are both the same
- name. Further, if I move the fire which is on the log back into
- the fire which is in the fire place, all I did was restore it the
- way it was. Therefore it was already two in one before I pulled
- it out!
-
- Let us suppose Jesus came from the Father like fire comes from
- fire. God from God, fire from fire. Is he any younger than his
- Father? No. Is there any difference in the type of substance or
- nature? No. The fire on the log demonstrates all of that. Yet,
- though the fire on the log is equal in age and substance it is
- logically subordinate to the fire in the fire place, because that
- is where it came from. So, there is a sequential relationship but
- not one we should measure by time.
-
- But all of this presumes the Five evidences exist. Here are
- some proofs to help you decide.
-
- I. Only one Being is truly God, and His name is Jehovah.
-
- In Isaiah 43:10,11 we read: "..Ye are my witnesses, saith the
- LORD (Jehovah) ...before me there was no God formed neither shall
- there be after me..".
-
- You might ask where I get authority to place Jehovah in
- parenthesis. Any place in the KJV Old Testament where the word
- Lord is in all capital letters (LORD), it is the name Jehovah.
- [There is some question as to which vowels go between the
- consonants, therefore LORD is used.] Here is another proof Jehovah
- is the only God Being: "...I am the first and I am the last and
- beside me there is no God....Is there a God beside me? yea, there
- is no God; I know not any". Isaiah 44:6,8
-
- As you can see, there is no room for two Gods nor for three.
- Jehovah says none exist except for himself. This rules out the
- Mormon idea of three Gods and it rules out the J.W. idea that Jesus
- is "a" god. No God exists except Jehovah. We have proven our first
- point. Only one Being is truly God and his name is Jehovah.
-
- II. The Father is identified as Jehovah or God.
-
- The Father is identified as Jehovah in Ps 110:1: "The LORD
- (Jehovah) said unto my Lord, Sit thou at my right hand until I make
- thine enemies thy footstool". Also in Psalms 2:7: "I will declare
- the decree: the LORD (Jehovah) hath said unto me, Thou art my Son;
- this day have I begotten thee."
-
- The person speaking is the Father, and the person being spoken
- to is Jesus. This makes the Father Jehovah. It might interest you
- that the Mormons deny the Father is Jehovah!
-
- In case there is still doubt the Father is the one speaking in
- these two verses, I refer you to Heb 1:5. We have proven our
- second point. The Father is Jehovah.
-
- III. Jesus is identified as Jehovah or God.
-
- There are numerous verses which identify Jesus as Jehovah. Let
- us begin with Heb 1:10-12: "And (the context means, "And also the
- Father says this about Jesus" see v.8), Thou, Lord, in the
- beginning hast laid the foundation of the earth; and the heavens
- are the works of thine hands; They shall perish but thou remainest;
- and they shall wax old as doth a garment; And as a vesture shalt
- thou fold them up, and they shall be changed: but thou art the
- same, and thy years shall not fail."
-
- Someone might ask how the verse makes Jesus to be Jehovah.
- Well, the whole passage is a quote from Psalms 102:25-27. The only
- difference is Psalms makes it refer to Jehovah whereas Hebrews
- makes it refer to Jesus! Ask yourself these questions:
-
- In Psalms, who is it that laid the foundation of the earth
- (V.25)? Jehovah (cf v.1). In Hebrews, who is it that laid the
- foundation of the earth? Jesus (v.10).
-
- In Psalms, the heavens are the work of whose hands (v.25)?
- Jehovah. But, whose hands were they according to Hebrews (v.10)?
- Jesus.
-
- In Psalms, who is it that shall endure longer than the heavens
- (26)? Jehovah. But, who is it in Hebrews (11)? Jesus.
-
- In Psalms who is it that never changes (v.27)? Jehovah. But,
- who is it that never changes in Hebrews (12)? Jesus.
-
- Here is another passage which does pretty much the same thing:
- "I the LORD (Jehovah) search the heart, I try the reins, even to
- give every man according to his ways, and according to the fruit
- of his doings." Jeremiah 17:10
-
- Now, compare that to this: "...I am he which searcheth the reins
- and hearts: and I will give unto everyone of you according to your
- works." Rev 2:23
-
- So, who is it that searches the reins and hearts? Well, in
- Jeremiah 17:10 it is Jehovah but, in Rev 2:23 it is Jesus! This
- is proven from v18,25,27 where it is clear Jesus is speaking. We
- have established our third point of the five. Jesus is identified
- as Jehovah.
-
- IV. The Holy Spirit is identified as Jehovah or God.
-
- In Acts 5:3-4, Ananias and his wife lied to the Holy Ghost.
- Peter tells them they have not lied unto man but unto God. And,
- what about this well worn verse? "...baptizing them in the name of
- the Father, and of the Son, and of the Holy Ghost." Mat 28:19 By
- mentioning the Holy Spirit equally with the Father and the Son, it
- means the Holy Spirit must also be Jehovah. And, here is one more:
- "...well spake the Holy Ghost by Esaias (Isaiah) the prophet
- ...saying, Go unto this people, and say, Hearing ye shall hear,
- and shall not understand..." Acts 28:25,26 The point is Jehovah
- does the speaking in Isaiah 6:9 but Acts credits the Holy Ghost as
- the speaker. We have established our fourth point. The Holy
- Spirit is identified as Jehovah and/or God.
-
- V. All three are identified as separate persons from one another.
-
- This has already been proven with John 1:1 as far as Jesus and
- the Father are concerned. The Holy Ghost is proven to be a
- distinct by the equal billing He is given in the baptismal formula
- and by the words of Jesus in John 14:26, "But the comforter, which
- is the Holy Ghost,...he shall teach you all things...." Jesus
- refers to the Holy Ghost in the third person ,"he". So the fifth
- point is established. The Father, Son, and Holy Spirit are
- identified as separate persons from one another.
-
- In Summary
-
- The Trinity is the only solution which does justice to the five
- evidences. The theories offered by the Mormons, J.W's and the
- United Pentecostals, all deny at least one of the five. The
- doctrine of the Trinity says Jehovah is a singular Being but
- hypostatically triune. One in Being, three in persons. An example
- of this would be three flames burning as a single flame. Jesus may
- have come from the Father as fire comes from fire. There is no
- difference in age or substance or name though there is a
- distinction in personality. Yet, it is a case where Jesus had
- always been from the Father. There was never a time when Jesus did
- not exist as a distinct person. As an example of how Jesus can
- proceed from the Father but have always existed I offer this. If
- there was such a thing as an eternal flame then the heat and light
- which proceed from it would also have been equally eternal and
- there would never have been a time when the flame existed with out
- the heat or light.